Global Summit Guide logo featuring mountain imagery, symbolizing hiking and mountaineering resources for trip planning and safety.

Last updated September 3, 2026

Denali mountain peak and winding path illustrating arctic-grade cold and expedition routes
National Park Service data · annual results 2000–2026 · 2026 still preliminary

Denali Summit Success Rate: 2026 Results, Annual Trends and What Improves Your Odds

The preliminary 2026 Denali result was 582 summits from 976 registered climbers. Those counts equal 59.6%; the National Park Service reports the season as 60% after rounding. The final 2025 rate was only 36%, while the weighted NPS baseline from 2000–2024 is 53.2%. Denali does not have one permanent summit-success percentage—the annual weather window can move the result dramatically.

NPS annual data raw counts shown rounded and calculated rates separated no invented guided-vs-independent rate
59.6%582 ÷ 976
60%NPS rounded 2026
36%2025 final
53.2%2000–24 weighted
69.2%2022 high
The direct answer

Denali’s Preliminary 2026 Summit Rate Was About 60%

The National Park Service’s July 20 season wrap-up reported 976 registered Denali climbers and 582 summits. Dividing those counts gives 59.6%. NPS rounded the result to 60%.

The NPS explicitly labeled those figures preliminary and said they could change in the full annual report. As of September 3, the final 2026 annual summary has not appeared in the public annual-summary material we could verify.

One year earlier, the final 2025 summit rate was only 36% from 960 registered climbers. Across the official NPS workbook from 2000–2024, Denali recorded 15,057 summits from 28,320 attempts, a weighted rate of 53.2%.

The 2025-to-2026 swing is the useful lesson: Denali’s long-run baseline is roughly one summit for every two attempts, but a particular season can land far above or below that average.

2026 climbers976
2026 summits582
Raw calculation59.6%
NPS reported60% rounded
2025 final36%
Modern baseline53.2%
A summit-success rate is not a personal probability. The annual number combines climbers with different routes, skills, schedules, health, team systems and weather exposure. It is best used to compare seasons and understand Denali’s volatility—not to promise an individual climber a 53%, 60% or any other fixed chance.
Preliminary 2026 result

A Bad May, Then a Major June Summit Surge

The final percentage looked strong. The route to that percentage was not smooth.

May

Slow Start

NPS described May weather as unusually poor. Only a handful of climbers summited early, and weather delayed installation of some ranger communications and medical infrastructure until the end of the month.

June 3

83 Summits in One Day

On June 3, 83 climbers reached the summit. That single day illustrates how Denali’s cumulative annual rate can change quickly when a broad weather window opens.

Season total

582 Summits / 976 Climbers

The raw-count result is 59.6%; NPS reported it as 60%. Participation was close to the 960 registered climbers in 2025, but the outcome was radically different.

NPS planning lesson

Bring Time, Not a Magic Arrival Date

NPS cautioned against treating the unusual 2026 timing as a formula for 2027. Its practical advice was to allow at least three weeks so the team can acclimatize and wait for weather.

Do not turn June 3 into a booking strategy. A record of 83 summits on one day tells us a good weather window existed; it does not tell us which future calendar date will reproduce it.
Denali and Alaska Range expedition terrain where annual weather strongly affects summit success
One mountain · very different years

Denali Can Swing 20–30 Percentage Points Without Changing Its Route.

The West Buttress remains the same broad expedition line. What changes is how much usable weather the season gives teams, how long they can wait, and how much health, food, fuel and strength remain when the window arrives.

Official NPS record

Denali Summit Success Rate by Year

2000–2024 uses the NPS compiled workbook. 2025 uses the final annual summary. 2026 remains preliminary.

52.6%
2021
69.2%
2022
30.3%
2023
49.9%
2024
36%
2025
59.6%
2026*
53.2%
Baseline
YearAttempts / registeredSummitsRateStatus
20001,20963352.4%Final workbook
20011,30577259.2%Final workbook
20021,23264552.4%Final workbook
20031,17968858.4%Final workbook
20041,27565651.5%Final workbook
20051,34077557.8%Final workbook
20061,15258250.5%Final workbook
20071,21857347.0%Final workbook
20081,27275559.4%Final workbook
20091,16168258.7%Final workbook
20101,22267054.8%Final workbook
20111,23268755.8%Final workbook
20121,22349840.7%Final workbook
20131,15178368.0%Final workbook
20141,20442935.6%Final workbook
20151,09062857.6%Final workbook
20161,12667559.9%Final workbook
20171,18949841.9%Final workbook
20181,11449644.5%Final workbook
20191,22679164.5%Final workbook
2020ClosedNo Denali / Foraker permits issued
20211,00753052.6%Final workbook
20221,12778069.2%Final workbook
20231,01730830.3%Final workbook
20241,04952349.9%Final workbook
2025960Not separately stated in summary text36.0%Final summary
202697658259.6% calculated / 60% NPS roundedPreliminary
Why 2025 does not show an invented summit count: the final NPS summary text reports 960 registered climbers and a 36% success rate but does not state the exact summit count in that passage. Multiplying 960 by 36% would only reverse-engineer a rounded estimate.
Nearly the same participation · radically different outcome

2025 vs 2026: Why One Permanent Denali Rate Does Not Work

2025 final

36% Summit Rate

NPS reported 960 registered climbers, including 922 on the West Buttress. Poor weather at the beginning and end of the season most likely contributed to the below-normal result.

Lesson: a full commercial season can finish far below the modern baseline.
2026 preliminary

59.6% From the Counts · NPS Says 60%

Participation rose by only 16 climbers, but 582 summits pushed the season well above the 53.2% modern baseline. Difficult May conditions were followed by a much more productive June.

Lesson: annual weather-window availability can dominate the mountain-wide result.
Weighted baseline, not an average of percentages

The Modern Denali Baseline Is 53.2%

A weighted result lets the years with more climbers contribute proportionally rather than pretending every annual percentage came from the same-sized sample.

54.8%2000–2009 · 6,761 / 12,343
52.3%2010–2019 · 6,155 / 11,777
51.0%2021–2024 · 2,141 / 4,200
53.2%2000–2024 · 15,057 / 28,320
What 53.2% means: in the combined 2000–2024 NPS record, there were 15,057 summits for 28,320 attempts. It does not mean a prepared climber arriving next May has exactly a 53.2% chance of standing on the summit.
Climbers on Denali expedition terrain where weather, load hauling and acclimatization affect summit outcomes
The denominator is only the beginning

Denali Success Is Built Before High Camp.

Pack-and-sled fatigue, glacier efficiency, altitude recovery, weather waiting, food and fuel management all determine whether a team still has enough margin when a summit window finally arrives.

Why annual success changes

Six Variables That Move the Denali Summit Rate

The NPS record supports these practical drivers without assigning made-up percentages to each failure reason.

Weather

Summit-Window Availability

High wind, cloud and snowfall can hold teams below High Camp or consume the schedule before a suitable summit day appears.

Time

Expedition Length

More days create room for acclimatization, rest and weather waiting. NPS specifically recommended allowing at least three weeks after the unusual 2026 season.

Health

Team Condition

Altitude illness, frostbite, trauma, respiratory problems and exhaustion can remove one climber or compromise an entire rope team.

Route

Upper-Mountain Conditions

Snow, ice, wind and travel above 14,200 feet affect movement speed, safety and turnaround decisions.

Workload

Pack + Sled Management

Heavy carries create fatigue long before summit day. Efficient caches and pacing preserve strength for the upper mountain.

Judgment

Decision Quality

Teams need enough food, fuel and schedule flexibility to wait—and enough discipline to turn around when health or weather makes the summit inappropriate.

A percentage without the route denominator can mislead

Denali Success by Route: Show the Sample

The mountain-wide annual rate is dominated by West Buttress climbers because the technical routes have much smaller annual samples.

2025 registrationClimbersWhat the sample tells you
West Buttress92296% of the 960 registered Denali climbers; the mountain-wide annual rate is primarily a West Buttress result.
Cassin Ridge20A small sample where one or two outcomes can move an annual percentage materially.
West Rib12Too small to treat one year’s percentage as a durable route success rate.
Messner Couloir3Tiny annual sample.
South Face2Tiny annual sample.
Orient Express1A percentage from a one-climber sample would be meaningless as a planning baseline.

Compare Denali routes →

Operator claims need their own denominator

Guided vs Independent Denali Success

The public NPS series used here does not support one universal mountain-wide guided-versus-independent percentage across the modern period.

Claim typeMinimum evidence neededHow to use it
Mountain-wide annual rateRegistered climbers/attempts + all summits for the same yearBest for comparing seasons.
Operator client rateNumber of clients, client summits, date range and exclusionsUseful for comparing that operator only.
Team expedition rateNumber of expeditions + definition of a successful expeditionDo not compare directly with client success.
Guided vs independent rateReproducible counts for both populations using one definitionPublish only when both denominators are available.
Be cautious with an operator that says “80% success” without explaining the unit. That could mean 80% of clients, 80% of teams, 80% of seasons or 80% of expeditions with at least one summit. Those are different statistics.

Compare Denali operators →

Summit percentage and safety are separate outcomes

2026 Was Successful—and Tragic

A high summit rate did not mean an easy or low-impact season.

Preliminary 2026 metricNPS countHow to interpret it
Helicopter search-and-rescue operations28Operational SAR workload, not a percentage of climbers rescued.
West Buttress deaths5NPS described the season as particularly tragic.
Trauma cases9Part of the preliminary illness/injury profile.
High-altitude illness7HAPE and HACE remained important upper-mountain hazards.
Medical cases5Medical problems beyond the altitude-illness category.
Severe frostbite5Cold protection and conservative weather decisions remain central.
Do not convert 28 helicopter SAR operations into “one rescue per X climbers.” An operation can involve more than one person, and NPS tracks patient care, evacuations, ground response and helicopter activity in different ways.

See Denali fatality data →

Control what you can control

How to Improve Your Denali Summit Chances

No preparation plan guarantees a summit. It can preserve options when the weather and mountain do not cooperate.

Plan at least three weeksGive the team enough time for acclimatization, recovery and weather waiting rather than relying on one forecast window.
Arrive competent on glaciersRoped travel and crevasse-rescue systems should be established before the Kahiltna Glacier.
Train for pack + sled carriesDenali fitness is repeated load hauling, not just one strong summit-day effort.
Protect acclimatizationDo not rush the schedule because a promising forecast appears early.
Carry margin in food and fuelA team cannot wait through storms if supplies were planned only for the fastest itinerary.
Test the full cold systemBoots, mittens, face protection, stove systems and sleep equipment should be proven before Alaska.
Use transparent team statisticsIf comparing operators, require the client count, summit count, years covered and definition of success.
Set turnaround thresholds earlyWind, health, frostbite signs, pace loss and schedule limits are easier to respect when agreed before summit commitment rises.
Data notes

How the Denali Success Numbers Are Calculated

The page keeps reported NPS percentages separate from percentages calculated directly from published counts.

2000–2024

NPS Compiled Annual Workbook

Annual summit counts are divided by annual attempt counts. The combined weighted baseline uses all 15,057 summits and 28,320 attempts.

2025

NPS Final Annual Summary

The public summary states 960 registered climbers and a 36% summit rate. We retain the official rounded percentage rather than manufacture an exact summit count.

2026

NPS Preliminary Wrap-Up

NPS reports 976 climbers, 582 summits and a rounded 60% result. The raw counts calculate to 59.6%. Both are shown so the arithmetic and the NPS wording are clear.

2020

Closed, Not 0%

No Denali or Foraker permits were issued during the COVID-19 closure. Labeling 2020 as a 0% summit year would imply failed climbing attempts that did not occur.

Final 2026 report status: the July 20 NPS wrap-up says the season figures are preliminary and directs readers to the later annual summary for final accounting. This page will keep the 2026 line marked preliminary until that final report is published and checked.

NPS 2026 Season Wrap-Up →   ·   NPS Annual Summaries →

Direct data answers

Denali Summit Success FAQ

What was Denali’s success rate in 2026?

The preliminary NPS wrap-up reported 582 summits from 976 registered climbers. Those counts equal 59.6%; NPS reported the result as 60% after rounding. The final annual summary may revise the numbers slightly.

What was Denali’s success rate in 2025?

The final NPS annual summary reported a 36% mountain-wide summit rate from 960 registered climbers. Poor weather at the beginning and end of the season most likely contributed.

What is Denali’s long-term summit success rate?

The weighted NPS result for 2000–2024 is 53.2%, calculated from 15,057 summits and 28,320 attempts.

What was Denali’s best year since 2000?

Within the 2000–2024 workbook, 2022 had the highest annual rate at approximately 69.2%, followed by 2013 at 68.0%.

What was Denali’s worst year since 2000?

Within the 2000–2024 workbook, 2023 was the lowest at approximately 30.3%. The final 2025 rate was also unusually low at 36%.

Why isn’t 2020 listed as 0%?

No Denali or Foraker permits were issued during the COVID-19 closure. A 0% rate would incorrectly imply that climbers attempted the mountain and all failed.

Do guided Denali climbers have a higher success rate?

Some guide services publish their own records, but the public NPS series used here does not give one simple guided-versus-independent mountain-wide rate for the entire modern period. Compare operator claims only when the underlying denominators and definitions are disclosed.

Is late May the best time to start Denali?

Late May is a core part of the main climbing season, but no fixed start date guarantees a summit. After the unusual 2026 pattern, NPS emphasized allowing at least three weeks rather than trying to predict one perfect calendar window.

How can I improve my chances of summiting?

Build adequate time into the expedition, arrive competent in glacier travel and crevasse rescue, train for repeated pack-and-sled carries, protect acclimatization, carry enough food and fuel to wait, test cold systems and define conservative turnaround thresholds before summit day.

Is the 2026 result final?

Not yet in the source material checked on September 3, 2026. The NPS July 20 wrap-up explicitly called the 976 climbers, 582 summits and 60% result preliminary and said the figures could change in the final annual summary.

The statistical lesson

Denali Is a Roughly Half-Success Mountain With Highly Variable Years.

The modern NPS baseline is 53.2%, but 2023 finished at 30.3% and the preliminary 2026 counts produce 59.6%. Use the long record to understand the mountain. Use current conditions, adequate expedition time, tested skills and conservative decisions to manage the climb in front of you.

Was this helpful?

Yes
No
Thanks for your feedback!
About Global Summit Guide

Global Summit Guide is an independent mountaineering resource founded in 2026. The team combines first-hand trekking and climbing experience with in-depth research and professional health and nutrition review to help climbers choose objectives, prepare properly, and stay safe.

Travis LudlowFounder & Head of Research · Master's in Business
Dawson LudlowClimbing & Mountaineering Lead
Walker LudlowClimber & Contributor

Health, altitude, and nutrition content is reviewed by Taylor Ludlow (Registered Nurse) and Brigg Hoopes (Nutritionist).

What We Don't Know Yet

Mountain information changes quickly. This box explains the limits of what this page can responsibly promise.

  • Permit availability, reservation windows, quotas, and official fee rules may change after this page is updated.
  • Weather, snowpack, avalanche risk, road access, and route conditions can change quickly and may be different on your climbing dates.
  • Fitness and altitude response vary by person; no guide, itinerary, or training plan can guarantee acclimatization or summit success.
  • Comparisons simplify complex decisions; the better mountain depends on current conditions, skills, timing, budget, and risk tolerance.
Confidence: Medium

Verify current conditions with official land managers, guide services, local forecasts, and current route reports before booking or climbing.

Safety, medical & liability disclaimer

Mountaineering, rock and ice climbing, glacier travel, and high-altitude activity are inherently dangerous and can result in serious injury or death. The information on Global Summit Guide is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional instruction, qualified guiding, proper equipment, or your own judgment and experience.

Route conditions, weather, snowpack, permits, regulations, and hazards change constantly and may differ from what is described here. Details may be incomplete, out of date, or contain errors. Always verify current information with local authorities, certified guides, and official sources before making any decision in the mountains.

Nothing on this site is medical, legal, or financial advice. Our fitness, acclimatization, altitude, and nutrition content is general in nature; consult a qualified physician before beginning any strenuous exercise program or exposing yourself to high altitude.

You are solely responsible for your own safety and decisions. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Global Summit Guide and its team accept no liability for any loss, injury, damage, or expense arising from use of, or reliance on, this information. By using this site you acknowledge these risks and accept these terms.

Some links on this site may be affiliate links. If you buy through them we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you; this never affects our recommendations.

Global Summit Guide recommendation path

Next Best Mountain to Research

Use these recommendations to continue the right planning path instead of stopping on one page.

Use current permit, weather, route, and operator information before booking or climbing.

Ready to Plan Your Adventure?

Find curated hotels, flights, and vacation packages for your next hiking or mountaineering trip through our Expedia Travel Shop.

Book Your Trip on Expedia →
Affiliate links to Expedia. Same price as direct booking. Disclosure.
Language »