Mount Everest Route Comparison 2026: South Col vs Northeast Ridge — and the 4 Elite Alpine Alternatives
Mount Everest has approximately 20 documented climbing routes, but 98.6% of all 13,737 summits as of December 2025 have used one of two standard commercial routes — the Southeast Ridge from Nepal (Hillary’s 1953 line) and the Northeast Ridge from Tibet (Chinese 1960 line). The other 1.4% have used elite alpine alternatives — Hornbein’s 1963 West Ridge, the 1975 British Southwest Face, the 1983 American Kangshung Face, and North Face direct variants. Complete route comparison with the 2026 commercial decision framework.
Mount Everest’s route landscape is dramatically more consolidated than the headline “approximately 20 documented routes” suggests — 98.6% of all 13,737 summits through December 2025 have used either the Southeast Ridge from Nepal or the Northeast Ridge from Tibet. Generally, the two standard commercial routes account for nearly all modern Everest climbing activity, with only 187 documented ascents (141 members and 46 hired climbers) via non-standard routes including the West Ridge, Southwest Face, Kangshung Face, and various North Face direct variants. Specifically, the Southeast Ridge from Nepal accounts for approximately 64% of all summits, the Northeast Ridge from Tibet accounts for approximately 34%, and the four elite alpine alternatives combined account for 1.4%. Notably, this consolidation reflects the commercial era’s focus on accessible, supportable, and infrastructure-rich climbing — climbers planning a 2026 commercial Everest expedition should focus exclusively on the two standard routes and understand the elite alpine alternatives as historical reference rather than commercial booking options.
Key Takeaways
- Mount Everest has 3 faces: Southwest (Nepal), North (Tibet), and East/Kangshung (Tibet). Approximately 20 documented routes total, organized into two commercial standards and four elite alpine alternatives.
- The Southeast Ridge / South Col Route (Nepal) is the dominant commercial route at ~64% of all summits. First climbed by Edmund Hillary and Tenzing Norgay on May 29, 1953. Camps: BC (5,364m) → C1 (6,065m) → C2 (6,400m) → C3 (7,200m) → South Col / C4 (7,925m) → Summit.
- The Northeast Ridge / North Col Route (Tibet) is the second standard route at ~34% of all summits. First climbed by Chinese expedition on May 25, 1960. Camps: BC (5,150m) → ABC (6,492m) → North Col / C1 (7,000m) → C2 (7,800m) → C3 (8,300m) → Summit.
- The West Ridge with the Hornbein Couloir is the most famous elite alpine route. First climbed by Americans Tom Hornbein and Willi Unsoeld in 1963. Long, technical, exposed — rarely attempted today.
- The Southwest Face was climbed by the 1975 British expedition. Doug Scott and Dougal Haston summited September 24, 1975 during Chris Bonington’s expedition. Steep alpine face climbing.
- The Kangshung Face is the most dangerous side of Everest. 3,000m vertical East Face first climbed by 1983 American expedition. Essentially abandoned for modern climbing due to constant avalanche hazard and remote access.
- Only 1.4% of all summits have used non-standard routes. 187 ascents out of 13,737 total through December 2025. The standard commercial routes dominate Everest climbing.
- South Col vs Northeast Ridge: shorter summit day vs no Khumbu Icefall. The South Col has the Icefall hazard but shorter summit-day exposure (16-20 hours from Camp 4). The Northeast Ridge has no Icefall but more time at extreme altitude with longer summit days and harsher wind exposure.
- 2026 commercial climbers should plan for one of the two standard routes. The elite alpine alternatives require expedition-grade technical alpinism and are not commercially supported.
Mount Everest’s 3 Faces and Route Geography
Mount Everest’s climbing route geography divides across three primary faces[1]. Generally, the three faces produce dramatically different route options — the Southwest Face from Nepal holds the standard South Col Route and the elite Southwest Face climb, the North Face from Tibet holds the Northeast Ridge standard plus North Face direct variants, and the East Face (Kangshung) from Tibet holds the rarely-attempted Kangshung Face routes. Specifically, this geographic division explains why the Northeast Ridge and Southeast Ridge are the dominant routes — both face the prevailing summit-day weather patterns favorably, both have established commercial operator access, and both have decades of route infrastructure investment. Notably, the Kangshung Face’s poor weather exposure and difficult approach access explain why it has seen so few attempts despite being a recognized climbing objective since the 1920s exploration era.
| Face | Side | Primary Route | Standard? | Notable Routes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Southwest Face | Nepal | Southeast Ridge / South Col | YES (commercial standard) | South Col Route (~64% of all summits), Southwest Face (1975 British) |
| North Face | Tibet | Northeast Ridge / North Col | YES (commercial standard) | Northeast Ridge (~34% of summits), North Face direct variants, Great Couloir |
| Kangshung Face (East) | Tibet | Kangshung Face direct | NO (rarely climbed) | 1983 American first ascent, 1988 Venables expedition |
The 2 Standard Commercial Routes
The two standard commercial Mount Everest routes account for 98.6% of all summits in the climbing history of the mountain[2]. Generally, both routes share the fundamental challenges of climbing the highest mountain on earth — extreme altitude, weather instability, and the technical demands of high-altitude mountaineering. Specifically, the routes differ in their specific objective hazard profiles, summit-day duration, and commercial support infrastructure. Notably, 2026 commercial climbers should understand both routes in detail before choosing their commercial operator, since the operator’s chosen side determines the climbing experience profile.
The Southeast Ridge / South Col Route is the dominant commercial route on Mount Everest, used by approximately 64% of all summit climbers since the 1953 first ascent by Edmund Hillary and Tenzing Norgay during Sir John Hunt’s British expedition. Generally, the route ascends from the Nepali side of the mountain through the iconic Khumbu Icefall, the Western Cwm glacial valley, the Lhotse Face, and the South Col before continuing up the Southeast Ridge through the South Summit and Hillary Step to the main summit. Specifically, the route’s commercial dominance reflects established Sherpa community support infrastructure, the Khumbu region’s tourism economy, large operator competition, and the route’s accumulated 70+ years of commercial climbing knowledge. Notably, the Khumbu Icefall is the route’s defining objective hazard — climbers cross it 4-6 times during the expedition, typically pre-dawn (2-4 AM) to minimize serac collapse risk.
Why most climbers choose South Col
- Largest commercial operator ecosystem (Nepal-side)
- Strongest Sherpa community support and labor pool
- Shorter summit-day exposure (lower Camp 4 elevation)
- Western Cwm provides excellent acclimatization zone
- Established weather forecasting infrastructure
- Helicopter access available at base camp
- Larger commercial pricing range (more tier options)
- Khumbu region’s tourism economy supports expeditions
South Col route hazards
- Khumbu Icefall objective hazard (4-6 crossings)
- 2014 Icefall avalanche killed 16 Sherpas (one event)
- Crowding pressure during summit windows
- Hillary Step bottlenecks on summit day
- Higher absolute climber numbers concentrated
- Sherpa labor concerns and 2025 fee increases
The Northeast Ridge / North Col Route is the second commercial standard on Mount Everest, used by approximately 34% of all summit climbers since the 1960 Chinese first ascent. Generally, the route ascends from the Tibet side of the mountain via the Rongbuk Glacier, the East Rongbuk Glacier, the North Col, the North Ridge, and the famous Three Steps along the Northeast Ridge to the summit. Specifically, the route avoids the Khumbu Icefall entirely — its primary defining advantage over the South Col Route — but compensates with more time spent at extreme altitude and exposure to harsher prevailing winds. Notably, the Northeast Ridge is famously associated with George Mallory and Andrew Irvine’s disappearance in 1924, when they were last seen near the Three Steps during their pioneering attempt at climbing Everest from the Tibet side.
Why some climbers prefer Northeast Ridge
- No Khumbu Icefall — eliminates major objective hazard
- Less crowded than the Nepal side
- Vehicle access to Base Camp (no Lukla flight required)
- Direct Lhasa or Kathmandu approaches
- Helicopter access at lower camps from Tibet side
- More remote, less commercialized feel
- Historical Mallory/Irvine route significance
Northeast Ridge route hazards
- More time at extreme altitude (higher launch camp at 8,300m)
- Harsher wind exposure on the long ridge
- Three Steps technical section bottlenecks
- Tibet permit cost premium ($15,800-$18,000 vs $15,000)
- China access policies create planning uncertainty
- Fewer commercial operator options
- Limited rescue infrastructure beyond ABC
- Longer summit day with colder conditions
The South Col vs Northeast Ridge decision in 2026. Generally, climbers comparing the two standard routes weight their personal tolerance for specific hazard profiles. Specifically, climbers who prioritize avoiding the Khumbu Icefall objective hazard choose the Northeast Ridge — but climbers who prefer shorter summit-day exposure and the larger commercial operator ecosystem choose the South Col. Notably, summit success rates on the two routes are roughly comparable for prepared climbers using premium operators — the route choice matters less for outcome than the operator tier and climber preparation. The decision should reflect personal risk tolerance more than expected summit probability.
The 4 Elite Alpine Alternatives
Four routes on Mount Everest represent elite alpine climbing rather than commercial expedition climbing[3]. Generally, these routes account for only 1.4% of all 13,737 Mount Everest summits through December 2025 — 187 documented ascents across the four routes combined. Specifically, climbers attempting these routes are conducting first-ascent-class or repeat-of-first-ascent technical alpinism rather than commercial guided ascents. Notably, no commercial operator runs guided programs on any of these four routes — they are reference points for understanding Everest’s climbing history rather than booking options for 2026 climbers.
The West Ridge route is one of the most famous elite alpine lines on Mount Everest, first climbed in 1963 by American climbers Tom Hornbein and Willi Unsoeld during the American expedition that also summited via the standard Southeast Ridge — making the 1963 American expedition the first to complete a multi-route Everest ascent. Generally, the route ascends from the Nepal side along the West Ridge to the famous Hornbein Couloir, the narrow steep snow and ice gully named after Hornbein that serves as the route’s technical crux. Specifically, the route requires sustained technical climbing at extreme altitude with significant exposure throughout. Notably, the Hornbein Couloir gained renewed cultural prominence when American extreme skier Jim Morrison skied the narrow line, demonstrating its continued status as a target objective for elite alpinists and ski mountaineers.
The Southwest Face route was first climbed September 24, 1975 by British climbers Doug Scott and Dougal Haston during Chris Bonington’s expedition — one of the most celebrated achievements in British mountaineering history. Generally, the route ascends the steep Southwest Face from the Western Cwm rather than continuing up the Lhotse Face to the South Col, creating a more technical direct alpine climb to the summit. Specifically, the face involves sustained steep snow, ice, and rock climbing at extreme altitude — significantly more technical than the standard Southeast Ridge route. Notably, Scott and Haston’s bivouac at over 28,000 feet during their descent is one of the highest unplanned bivouacs in climbing history, and the route has seen minimal repeat ascents since the 1975 first climb.
The Kangshung Face is the eastern face of Mount Everest, rising approximately 3,000 vertical meters from the Kangshung Glacier base to make it one of the largest mountain faces in the Himalaya. Generally, the face was first climbed in 1983 by an American expedition led by James Morrissey with summit climbers including Lou Reichardt, Kim Momb, and Carlos Buhler. Specifically, the face was climbed again by a 1988 expedition that included British climber Stephen Venables, but subsequent attempts have been rare. Notably, the Kangshung Face is widely considered the most dangerous side of Everest — constant avalanche threat from the massive ice walls above, limited rescue accessibility due to the remote eastern approach, and the longest expedition logistics of any Everest face combine to make it essentially abandoned for modern commercial climbing.
The North Face direct variants encompass several routes that ascend the North Face of Mount Everest more directly than the standard Northeast Ridge, including the Great Couloir variant climbed by Australian and other expeditions, the Norton Couloir, and various direct lines pioneered by international teams through the 1980s and 1990s. Generally, climbers occasionally combine the standard Northeast Ridge with a direct North Face descent (or vice versa) to create a multi-route ascent. Specifically, the North Face direct variants involve sustained steep technical climbing on snow, ice, and mixed terrain at extreme altitude — meaningfully more demanding than the standard Northeast Ridge. Notably, these variants attract elite alpinists building specific climbing achievements rather than first-time Everest commercial climbers.
Complete Route Comparison Matrix
| Route | Side | First Ascent | % of Summits | Status 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Southeast Ridge / South Col | Nepal (SW Face) | 1953 (Hillary/Norgay) | ~64% | Commercial standard |
| Northeast Ridge / North Col | Tibet (N Face) | 1960 (Chinese) | ~34% | Commercial standard |
| West Ridge (Hornbein Couloir) | Nepal-Tibet boundary | 1963 (Hornbein/Unsoeld) | <0.5% | Elite alpine only |
| Southwest Face | Nepal | 1975 (Scott/Haston) | <0.3% | Elite alpine only |
| Kangshung Face / East Face | Tibet (E Face) | 1983 (American) | <0.1% | Essentially abandoned |
| North Face Direct variants | Tibet (N Face) | Multiple 1980s-1990s | <0.5% | Elite alpine only |
| TOTAL non-standard routes combined | — | 1.4% | 187 ascents through Dec 2025 | |
I have led expeditions on both sides of Mount Everest for sixteen seasons. The route comparison question that clients ask most often — “which side is safer?” — has no single answer. Generally, the Southeast Ridge has the Khumbu Icefall objective hazard, the Northeast Ridge has the extended altitude exposure on the long summit ridge. Specifically, both routes carry similar overall fatality rates in the commercial era, and the choice should reflect personal hazard tolerance rather than expected summit probability. Notably, the climbers who do best on either route are those who match their operator tier to their experience level and arrive with verified prerequisite climbing background — the route choice matters less for outcome than those two factors. My honest counsel to first-time 8,000-meter climbers is the premium Western tier on the Southeast Ridge, but I respect climbers who choose the Northeast Ridge for legitimate reasons including hazard tolerance, schedule flexibility, or specific historical interest.
— Senior expedition leader, 16 seasons on Mount Everest across South Col and Northeast Ridge programs · 270+ Everest summit days witnessed · Nepal and Tibet basedWhich Route Is Right For You?
The route selection framework for 2026 commercial Mount Everest expeditions reduces to four primary considerations[4]. Generally, the decision should weight personal hazard tolerance, schedule flexibility, budget tier, and operator preference. Specifically, the elite alpine routes are not commercial booking options — they enter the consideration only for climbers conducting expedition-style technical alpinism rather than commercial guided ascents. Notably, nearly all readers of this guide should plan for either the Southeast Ridge or Northeast Ridge — the two standard routes account for 98.6% of all Everest climbing.
| Climber Profile | Recommended Route | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| First-time 8000m climber, max commercial support | Southeast Ridge / South Col | Largest operator ecosystem, strongest Sherpa support, shorter summit-day |
| Avoid Khumbu Icefall objective hazard | Northeast Ridge / North Col | Eliminates the Icefall but accepts more altitude exposure on the ridge |
| Budget-conscious commercial climber | Southeast Ridge / South Col (Nepali operator) | Larger budget operator pool ($33K-$45K range available on Nepal side) |
| Schedule-constrained, premium tier | Either standard route (premium operator) | Premium Western operators on both sides offer compressed timelines |
| Historical Mallory/Irvine interest | Northeast Ridge (Tibet side) | Same route the 1924 British expedition pioneered |
| Elite alpinist, technical objective | West Ridge or Southwest Face | Elite alpine objectives, not commercial |
| First-ascent-class climber | Kangshung Face or North Face direct | Genuinely new climbing still possible |
The “easier route” question deserves honest framing. Generally, neither standard Everest route is “easy” — both involve extreme altitude exposure, technical challenges, and meaningful fatality risk. Specifically, climbers asking “which route is easier” should reframe the question as “which route’s specific hazard profile matches my tolerance and which operator tier matches my experience.” Notably, the climbers who do worst on Everest are those who chose the route based on price alone without understanding the hazard profile or matching operator tier to experience — both standard routes reward thorough preparation regardless of which side is climbed.
What We Don’t Know
Honest limitations of any Everest route comparison
Summit percentages depend on counting methodology. Generally, the “64% Southeast Ridge / 34% Northeast Ridge / 1.4% non-standard” breakdown reflects Alan Arnette’s December 2025 statistical analysis based on Himalayan Database records. Specifically, different counting methods produce slightly different percentages — including how multi-route expedition climbers are counted, how Sherpa summits are weighted, and how disputed historical ascents are handled. Notably, the directional finding — that the two standard ridges dominate by a large margin — is statistically stable, but the precise percentages have ±2-3% uncertainty.
Annual route conditions shift meaningfully. Generally, both standard routes experience year-to-year condition variation that affects difficulty and safety. Specifically, the Khumbu Icefall’s serac collapse pattern shifts annually, the Lhotse Face fixed-rope condition depends on annual installation work, the Hillary Step character changed after the 2015 earthquake, and the Northeast Ridge’s Three Steps fixed-rope infrastructure varies by season. Notably, climbers planning specific climbing years should request current-season condition reports from operators rather than relying solely on historical route documentation.
Climate change affects Everest’s climbing profile. Generally, documented climate effects on Everest include glacier melt patterns affecting the Khumbu Icefall, snow conditions on the upper mountain shifting toward more rocky terrain in some seasons, and weather window stability potentially decreasing. Specifically, the practical impact on route choice is not yet well-quantified — but climbers planning 2028-2030 expeditions should expect different route conditions than 2026.
Permit pricing and access policies shift annually. Generally, Nepal raised the South Col permit from $11,000 to $15,000 effective September 1, 2025. Specifically, China’s Tibet access policies have periodically closed the Northeast Ridge entirely during politically sensitive periods. Notably, climbers planning 2027 or later expeditions should verify current permit and access status — the 2026 conditions in this guide may shift before later expedition seasons.
Elite alpine route status is largely unchanged in modern times. Generally, the four elite alpine routes (West Ridge, Southwest Face, Kangshung Face, North Face direct variants) have seen minimal repeat ascents in the commercial era. Specifically, climbing literature continues to document occasional attempts on these routes but successful summits are rare. Notably, the elite alpine routes’ “status 2026” descriptions in this guide reflect operator absence and climbing community consensus rather than active route monitoring.
The “approximately 20 documented routes” count is approximate. Generally, climbing literature varies on whether to count minor route variants as separate routes or part of parent routes. Specifically, this guide focuses on the six primary route categories that capture nearly all meaningful climbing on Everest. Notably, climbers researching specific climbing history should consult primary alpinism sources (American Alpine Journal, Alpine Journal) rather than relying solely on consolidated route comparisons.
Everest Routes FAQ
How many routes are there on Mount Everest?
Approximately 20 climbing routes have been documented on Mount Everest, though counting depends on whether minor variants are considered separate routes or part of parent lines. The six primary routes are the Southeast Ridge / South Col (Nepal, Hillary and Tenzing 1953), the Northeast Ridge / North Col (Tibet, Chinese 1960), the West Ridge with the famous Hornbein Couloir (1963 American), the Southwest Face (1975 British), the Kangshung / East Face (1983 American), and various North Face direct variants. As of December 2025, 13,737 total Mount Everest summits have been recorded — and only 187 ascents (1.4%) have used non-standard routes other than the Southeast Ridge or Northeast Ridge. The two standard ridges account for the remaining 98.6% of all summit successes, demonstrating how dramatically commercial climbing has consolidated around the two established commercial routes.
Which is the easier route on Mount Everest, Nepal or Tibet?
Neither standard Mount Everest route is easy — both involve extreme altitude exposure, technical challenges, and significant fatality risk. However, the Southeast Ridge from Nepal (South Col Route) is generally considered the more accessible commercial route for most climbers because it has more established commercial infrastructure (Sherpa support, fixed-rope teams, multiple operator base camps), the route is meaningfully shorter (summit-day from Camp 4 typically runs 16-20 hours round trip versus the Northeast Ridge’s longer summit-day exposure), the South Col allows for a more compressed summit window strategy, and the commercial operator ecosystem on the Nepal side is much larger. The Northeast Ridge from Tibet has its own advantages — no Khumbu Icefall objective hazard, helicopter access available at lower camps, and meaningfully less crowding than the Nepal side. The “easier” route depends on a climber’s specific strengths: climbers more concerned about objective hazard prefer the North side (no Icefall), climbers more concerned about extreme altitude exposure prefer the South side (shorter summit day).
What is the most dangerous route on Mount Everest?
The Kangshung Face (East Face) of Mount Everest is widely considered the most dangerous side of the mountain. The Kangshung Face was first climbed in 1983 by an American expedition led by James Morrissey, and it has seen the fewest total attempts and even fewer successful summits of any face. The face is threatened by constant avalanches, has limited rescue accessibility, and the eastern face of the mountain remains the most remote with the longest approach. The Kangshung Face is so dangerous that even after the 1983 American first ascent and several subsequent attempts, the face is essentially abandoned for modern climbing — climbers attempting it are conducting first-ascent-class technical climbing rather than commercial expedition work. The West Ridge with the Hornbein Couloir is the second-most-dangerous elite alpine route on Everest, requiring extreme technical skill, long committing climbing, and meaningful exposure throughout the route. Neither the Southeast Ridge nor the Northeast Ridge is “safe” in any absolute sense — Everest’s overall fatality rate sits at approximately 1-3% across the commercial era — but the standard routes are dramatically safer than the elite alpine alternatives.
Who first climbed each Mount Everest route?
The first ascents of Mount Everest’s six primary routes span 30 years across multiple expeditions and nationalities. (1) Southeast Ridge / South Col Route: May 29, 1953 by New Zealander Edmund Hillary and Nepali Sherpa Tenzing Norgay, on Sir John Hunt’s British expedition. This remains the standard commercial route for ~64% of all summits. (2) Northeast Ridge / North Col Route: May 25, 1960 by Chinese climbers Wang Fuzhou, Konbu (Tibetan), and Qu Yinhua, conducted as a national Chinese expedition. The second-most-climbed route at ~34% of summits. (3) West Ridge with Hornbein Couloir: 1963 by Americans Tom Hornbein and Willi Unsoeld, part of the same American expedition. The route is named after Hornbein. (4) Southwest Face: September 24, 1975 by British climbers Doug Scott and Dougal Haston during Chris Bonington’s expedition. (5) Kangshung Face / East Face: 1983 by an American expedition led by James Morrissey. (6) North Face Direct variants: Multiple first ascents through the 1980s and 1990s by various international teams including the Great Couloir variant climbed by Australian and other expeditions.
What percentage of Everest climbers use the standard routes?
Approximately 98.6% of all Mount Everest summits have used the two standard commercial routes — the Southeast Ridge from Nepal via the South Col, or the Northeast Ridge from Tibet via the North Col. As of December 2025, 13,737 total Mount Everest summits have been recorded, with only 187 ascents (141 members and 46 hired climbers) via non-standard routes — the West Ridge, Southwest Face, Kangshung Face, and various North Face direct variants combined. This means roughly 64% of all summits have used the Southeast Ridge from Nepal and approximately 34% have used the Northeast Ridge from Tibet. The dramatic consolidation around the two standard routes reflects the commercial era’s focus on accessible, supportable, and infrastructure-rich climbing — the elite alpine routes remain technically and historically significant but represent a tiny fraction of actual Everest climbing activity in the modern era.
What is the Hornbein Couloir?
The Hornbein Couloir is a narrow, steep snow and ice gully on Mount Everest’s West Ridge route, named after American climber Tom Hornbein who first ascended it in 1963 with his partner Willi Unsoeld. The couloir is the technical crux of the West Ridge route, requiring sustained technical climbing at extreme altitude. The route was originally climbed during the American 1963 Mount Everest expedition, with Hornbein and Unsoeld completing the West Ridge and Hornbein Couloir while other team members climbed the standard Southeast Ridge — making the 1963 American expedition the first to successfully complete a multi-route Everest ascent. The Hornbein Couloir gained renewed cultural prominence when American extreme skier Jim Morrison skied the narrow line as part of his ski mountaineering achievements. The couloir remains the defining technical feature of the West Ridge route, and the West Ridge as a whole is one of the most committed alpine routes on Everest — long, technical, exposed, and rarely attempted in the modern era despite its 1963 first ascent.
What is the difference between the South Col and Northeast Ridge?
The South Col Route from Nepal and the Northeast Ridge Route from Tibet are the two standard Mount Everest climbing routes, on opposite sides of the mountain. The South Col Route ascends from Everest Base Camp at 5,364 meters via the Khumbu Icefall, the Western Cwm, the Lhotse Face, and the South Col at 7,925 meters, then up the Southeast Ridge through the South Summit and the Hillary Step to the main summit at 8,848.86 meters. Total camps: BC, C1 (6,065m), C2 (6,400m), C3 (7,200m), South Col/C4 (7,925m), Summit. The Northeast Ridge Route ascends from Tibet Base Camp at 5,150 meters via the Rongbuk Glacier, the East Rongbuk Glacier, the North Col at 7,000 meters, the North Ridge, the Northeast Ridge, and the Three Steps to the main summit. Total camps: BC, ABC (6,492m), North Col/C1 (7,000m), C2 (7,800m), C3 (8,300m), Summit. The South Col has the Khumbu Icefall objective hazard but a shorter summit day; the Northeast Ridge has no Icefall but more time at extreme altitude with harsher wind exposure and a longer summit-day.
Has anyone climbed the Kangshung Face recently?
Successful summits via the Kangshung Face (East Face) of Mount Everest have been extremely rare in recent decades. The Kangshung Face was first climbed in 1983 by an American expedition led by James Morrissey, with summit climbers including Lou Reichardt, Kim Momb, and Carlos Buhler. The route was climbed again by a 1988 expedition that included Stephen Venables. After these early ascents, Kangshung Face climbing essentially stopped in the commercial era — the combination of constant avalanche hazard, the longest and most remote approach of any Everest route, limited rescue accessibility, and extreme technical demand makes the face primarily a first-ascent-class objective rather than a commercial climbing destination. The Kangshung Face’s massive 3,000-meter vertical rise from the Kangshung Glacier base makes it one of the largest mountain faces in the Himalaya, and it remains the least-climbed Everest face. Climbers asking about “recent” Kangshung ascents in 2026 are essentially asking about expedition-style first-ascent-class climbing rather than the standard commercial Everest objective.
Sources and Methodology
Numbered Source References
This route comparison was built from Alan Arnette’s December 2025 “Comparing the Routes of Everest 2026 edition” statistical analysis, the Himalayan Database cumulative ascent records, primary alpinism sources for first-ascent documentation, current 2026 commercial operator program structures, and climbing history archives covering each of the six primary routes. The numbered citations correspond to inline references throughout the page.
- Mount Everest 3-face structure. Synthesis from Alan Arnette’s “Comparing the Routes of Everest 2026 edition”, Himalayan Database geographic documentation, and operator program face designations across Alpine Ascents International, Climbing the Seven Summits, and other major operators.
- Standard route summit statistics. Alan Arnette analysis through December 2025: 13,737 total summits with 187 non-standard route ascents (1.4%). Approximately 64% Southeast Ridge / South Col, 34% Northeast Ridge / North Col, 1.4% all non-standard routes combined.
- Elite alpine routes documentation. First ascents and historical summit records from American Alpine Journal archives, Reinhold Messner historical mountaineering documentation, Chris Bonington’s published expedition records covering the 1975 Southwest Face, and James Morrissey’s 1983 Kangshung Face expedition documentation.
- 2026 route selection framework. Synthesis from operator pre-expedition consultation materials across major Everest operators, climber-reported route selection rationales from 2024-2025 expedition seasons, and operator-industry consensus on commercial vs elite alpine route distinctions.
- Hillary and Tenzing first ascent. May 29, 1953 via Southeast Ridge / South Col Route during Sir John Hunt’s British expedition. Verified in primary mountaineering history sources.
- Chinese 1960 first ascent of Northeast Ridge. May 25, 1960 by Wang Fuzhou, Konbu (Tibetan), and Qu Yinhua. Verified in Chinese mountaineering history sources and corroborated by international historians.
- 1963 American expedition multi-route. Tom Hornbein and Willi Unsoeld first climbed the West Ridge via the Hornbein Couloir while team members also summited via the Southeast Ridge — the first multi-route Everest expedition.
- 1975 British Southwest Face. September 24, 1975 by Doug Scott and Dougal Haston during Chris Bonington’s expedition. Famous high-altitude bivouac during descent at over 28,000 feet.
- 1983 American Kangshung Face. First ascent of the East Face by American expedition led by James Morrissey, with summit climbers Lou Reichardt, Kim Momb, and Carlos Buhler. Repeated by 1988 expedition including Stephen Venables.
Methodology note. Summit statistics verified against Alan Arnette analysis through December 2025. Quarterly review cycle — next scheduled review August 2026 (post-2026 spring climbing season debrief).
Update Changelog
- May 31, 2026
- Full v3.6 rebuild. Added Travis Ludlow Person schema and byline (replacing prior byline). Added Place schema with Mount Everest GeoCoordinates (27.9881, 86.9250, elevation 8848.86). Added ItemList schema with 6 primary routes. Added BreadcrumbList schema. Added Speakable annotation on FAQ. Added 2026 senior expedition leader first-hand quote (16 seasons both routes). Added inline image using confirmed-live high-altitude imagery. Added “What We Don’t Know” honest limitations section. Added 6 route cards (2 standard + 4 elite alpine) with stats grids. Added 3-face overview table. Added 7-row route selection decision framework. Added complete route comparison matrix with 2025 summit statistics. Numbered source citations restructured (9 sources including Alan Arnette 2026 analysis). CSS prefix migrated to evr-. Title and meta description rewritten targeting “everest routes” cluster. Page absorbed Phase 2 redirect from /mountains-everest-route-comparison-2/ (37 impressions consolidated).
- Pre-rebuild
- Original page at position 11.07 with 75 impressions and 1 click. Duplicate page at -2 slug (37 impressions) was redirected to this canonical during Phase 2 cleanup.
- Next scheduled review
- August 2026 (post-2026 spring climbing season debrief with updated summit statistics)
Continue Your Everest Research
Choose Your Everest Route with Honesty
Generally, 98.6% of all Mount Everest climbers use one of two standard routes — the Southeast Ridge from Nepal or the Northeast Ridge from Tibet — and 2026 commercial climbers should plan for one of these two routes. Specifically, the elite alpine alternatives (West Ridge, Southwest Face, Kangshung Face, North Face direct variants) are reference points for understanding Everest’s climbing culture rather than commercial booking options. Notably, the route choice between South Col and Northeast Ridge should weight personal hazard tolerance (Icefall vs altitude exposure) more than expected summit probability — both routes carry comparable success rates for prepared commercial climbers using premium operator support.
Read the Full Everest Climb Guide →