web analytics

Last updated September 21, 2026

Annapurna I and the Annapurna massif in Nepal
Annapurna I · June 3, 1950 · first 8,000-metre summit

Annapurna 1950: The First 8,000er

On June 3, 1950, Maurice Herzog and Louis Lachenal reached the 8,091 m summit of Annapurna I without supplementary oxygen, becoming the first people to stand on any 8,000-metre peak. No one died on the expedition—but the descent nearly killed the summit pair. Herzog ultimately lost all of his fingers and toes to frostbite; Lachenal lost all of his toes. Terray and Rébuffat became snow-blind, the group bivouacked in a crevasse, and an avalanche swept part of the retreating party. The first 8,000er was a triumph measured in both history and permanent injury.

June 3, 1950 8,091 m Herzog + Lachenal first 8,000er ever climbed
Direct answer

Who first climbed Annapurna I?

Maurice Herzog and Louis Lachenal of France made the first ascent of Annapurna I on June 3, 1950. They reached the summit at about 2 p.m. without supplementary oxygen. It was the first successful ascent of any mountain above 8,000 metres—three years before Everest. The summit itself was only half the story: both men suffered catastrophic frostbite during the retreat, and the rest of the expedition had to help them survive the descent and evacuation.

The expedition at a glance

Historic Success, No Deaths—and an Extraordinary Human Cost

The 1950 expedition succeeded in one of mountaineering’s great firsts, but the physical price paid by Herzog and Lachenal makes it unlike a simple summit celebration.

Summit dateJune 3, 1950Herzog and Lachenal reached the top at about 2 p.m.
Elevation8,091 m26,545 ft; the world’s tenth-highest mountain.
Expedition deaths0No member died during the 1950 expedition.
Permanent injuriesSevereHerzog lost all fingers and toes; Lachenal all toes.
Central Nepal in 1950

The Expedition Began With Dhaulagiri—and Had to Find Annapurna

The team entered a part of Nepal that was poorly mapped for foreign climbers. They spent weeks reconnoitering Dhaulagiri and the Annapurna massif before identifying the Miristi Khola approach to Annapurna’s north side.

Expedition geography

The route search was part mountaineering and part exploration.

Tukucha / Kali GandakiPrimary reconnaissance base between the Dhaulagiri and Annapurna massifs.
DhaulagiriThe team’s first major objective; rejected after reconnaissance showed an ascent unlikely before the monsoon.
Miristi KholaThe key valley that opened access to Annapurna’s north side.
North FaceThe line selected for the rapid final push.
Camp V · ~24,300 ftHerzog and Lachenal’s summit camp on June 2.
Historical comparison map of the Annapurna region based on survey maps and Herzog's expedition mapping
Poor maps were part of the challenge

The Expedition Was Searching for the Mountain as Well as a Route

Herzog’s account repeatedly notes that available topographic information was vague or inaccurate. The French team had to reconcile old survey mapping with what they actually saw in the Kali Gandaki and Miristi Khola valleys.

Historical map comparison: Wikimedia Commons, based on Survey of India material and Herzog’s published map.
A small, elite postwar French expedition

The 1950 Team Was More Than Herzog and Lachenal

The famous summit pair depended on climbers, doctors, photographers, diplomats, Sherpa staff and porters. The contemporary American Alpine Journal described a compact team chosen for speed and physical conditioning.

Leadership

Maurice Herzog

Expedition leader, strong amateur climber and one of the two eventual summiters.

His later book shaped the public memory of Annapurna.
Professional guides

Lachenal · Terray · Rébuffat

Three elite Chamonix guides formed the technical core of the climbing team.

Lachenal summited; Terray and Rébuffat became critical rescuers.
Climbers

Jean Couzy · Marcel Schatz

Worked on reconnaissance, route finding, camps and the descent.

Schatz’s appearance during the retreat helped reconnect the stranded upper group.
Medical

Dr. Jacques Oudot

Expedition doctor who treated catastrophic frostbite during the long evacuation.

His work kept the summit pair alive through the retreat.
Documentation

Marcel Ichac

Photographer and filmmaker who helped document the expedition and its aftermath.

The images helped turn the climb into a global event.
Nepali support

Angtharkay and the Sherpa team

Sirdar Angtharkay and Sherpa climbers carried loads, built camps and physically supported the injured climbers during descent.

The summit story is incomplete without them.
The expedition changed objectives in midstream

Dhaulagiri Was the First Choice

The French arrived with permission to attempt either Dhaulagiri or Annapurna. For much of April and early May they explored Dhaulagiri first. The mountain’s ridges appeared too long, difficult and committing to climb before the monsoon.

On May 14, Herzog made the strategic decision to switch to Annapurna. The expedition still did not know whether a practical route existed. They had only weeks before the expected monsoon.

This was not a fully planned Annapurna expedition from Paris.

Its defining feature was adaptation: abandon one 8,000er, locate another, find a new access valley, identify a route and move fast enough to finish before the weather changed.

Aerial view of the Annapurna massif in Nepal
Annapurna massif aerial orientation. Wikimedia Commons.
A rapid six-day assault

The North Face Route Passed Through Avalanche and Serac Terrain

The contemporary American Alpine Journal described the route above Camp II as steep snow and ice frequently swept by avalanches and broken by icefalls, huge crevasses and séracs. The expedition’s speed reduced time at altitude—but also left little margin once the descent turned bad.

StageApprox. elevation1950 route characterHistorical significance
Camp INorth glacierFirst established camp after the Miristi Khola approachConverted reconnaissance into a real summit attempt
Camp II~19,700 ftAt the foot of the technical sectionDoctor and support later received the frostbite casualties here
Camp III~21,300 ftNear major crevasse and icefall terrainPart of the steep, avalanche-exposed middle face
Camp IV / “Sickle”~22,600 ftNear the upper edge of a semicircular ice-and-rock barrierThe Sickle became a defining feature of the route
Camp V~24,300 ftHigh summit campHerzog and Lachenal departed from here at dawn on June 3
Summit8,091 mUpper snow slopesFirst human ascent of any 8,000-metre mountain
View toward Annapurna I and the Sickle area of the north face
The historic North Face

The Route Was Fast—Not Safe

Herzog’s team chose the line that gave them the best chance of beating the monsoon. Contemporary accounts describe continual avalanche noise and a labyrinth of ice walls, crevasses and unstable snow.

Photo: Wikimedia Commons · Annapurna I / Sickle / Tilicho view.
June 3, 1950

Herzog and Lachenal Reached the Summit Without Oxygen

They left Camp V around dawn and reached the summit at about 2 p.m. The ascent created the first successful 8,000-metre summit in history.

Herzog and Lachenal left Camp V

Angtharkay and Ang Dawa had helped establish the high camp but returned lower. Herzog and Lachenal continued alone.

Lachenal became increasingly worried about frostbite

Later accounts of Lachenal’s notebooks emphasize that his feet were becoming dangerously cold and that he wanted to descend.

They reached 8,091 metres

The pair stood on Annapurna I, becoming the first humans to summit an 8,000er.

Herzog removed his gloves

While handling his camera or equipment, Herzog lost his gloves down the slope. The mistake became catastrophic during the descent.

The summit success immediately became a survival problem

Lachenal’s feet were already freezing, Herzog’s hands were exposed, clouds built and the weather deteriorated.

Annapurna I, Tilicho and Nilgiri in the Annapurna Himal
The summit was the beginning of the hardest part

The First 8,000er Was Won Before Anyone Knew Whether the Summiters Would Live

The summit photograph became an icon. The next two days—frostbite, falls, whiteout, snow blindness, a crevasse bivouac and avalanche—are what turned the expedition into one of mountaineering’s defining survival stories.

Photo: Wikimedia Commons · Annapurna I, Tilicho and Nilgiri.
June 3–5, 1950

The Descent Nearly Killed the Summit Pair—and Their Rescuers

The sequence below is drawn from the 1951 Himalayan Journal and American Alpine Journal accounts.

Herzog and Lachenal separated on descent

Herzog descended toward Camp V while Lachenal moved separately. Lachenal later fell down the slope, lost equipment and stopped himself with his crampons.

Terray and Rébuffat became the support team

They had moved up to support the summit pair and immediately confronted badly frozen hands and feet.

The four became lost in worsening weather

Snow and cloud made the route difficult to locate. Terray and Rébuffat would become snow-blind after removing or failing to use eye protection while searching for the way.

Lachenal fell into a crevasse that became their shelter

The shallow bridged crevasse gave all four a place to survive the night. They shared one sleeping bag around their feet.

An avalanche passed over the bivouac

Snow covered the shelter and buried equipment, including boots that had to be dug out before the group could continue.

Schatz found the stranded group

Marcel Schatz appeared through the deep snow and helped reconnect them with Camp IV and the Sherpa support team.

A slab avalanche swept part of the retreating group

Herzog and Sherpa teammates were swept; Herzog was left hanging over an ice shaft before being pulled back to the surface.

Dr. Oudot took over

The expedition’s survival problem shifted from mountain rescue to prolonged medical evacuation.

The cost of the summit

Herzog Lost All Fingers and Toes; Lachenal Lost All Toes

The 1951 Himalayan Journal states the outcome plainly. Modern retellings sometimes soften the medical result, but the amputations were extensive and permanent.

Maurice Herzog

Hands and feet catastrophically frozen

After losing his gloves and continuing the descent, Herzog suffered deep frostbite in all four extremities.

He ultimately lost all fingers and toes.
Louis Lachenal

Feet catastrophically frozen

Lachenal recognized the danger early because his livelihood depended on his feet as a professional guide.

He ultimately lost all toes.
Terray & Rébuffat

Snow blindness

The rescuers impaired their own vision while searching for the route in storm and glare.

Two injured summiters were now descending with two temporarily blind rescuers.

There were no expedition deaths—but “no deaths” does not mean a low-cost success.

The retreat required emergency treatment, physical carrying, repeated injections and weeks of evacuation. The summit pair returned to France as national heroes with permanent amputations.

Panoramic view of the Annapurna massif in Nepal
A team achievement hidden behind two summit names

Herzog and Lachenal Reached the Top. The Expedition Got Them Home.

Terray, Rébuffat, Schatz, Couzy, Oudot, Ichac, Angtharkay and the Sherpa team carried the consequences of the summit with them. Without the support system below the two summiters, the first 8,000er could easily have become a fatal first ascent.

Photo: Wikimedia Commons · Annapurna Massif Panorama.
Who made survival possible?

The Descent Was a Collective Rescue

Popular retellings center Herzog because he led the expedition and wrote its bestselling book. The retreat shows why a broader cast matters.

Person / groupRole during the crisisWhy it mattered
Lionel TerrayMoved to high camp, treated the summiters, helped navigate and refused to abandon HerzogProvided technical and physical support when Herzog could barely use his hands or feet
Gaston RébuffatHigh support, route finding and descentContinued despite becoming snow-blind
Marcel SchatzFound the stranded upper group after the crevasse bivouacReconnected them with the lower route and camps
Dr. Jacques OudotEmergency frostbite treatment and evacuation medicineManaged injuries severe enough to threaten life as well as limbs
Angtharkay and Sherpa teamLoad carrying, camp support, rope assistance and physical transportEnabled injured climbers to move through terrain they could no longer negotiate independently
Marcel Ichac / expedition staffLogistics, documentation and evacuation supportHelped turn a summit disaster into a survivable retreat
The official story was not the only story

Later Accounts Complicated Herzog’s Famous Narrative

Herzog’s Annapurna became one of the most influential mountaineering books ever written. Later publications of Lachenal’s notebooks and other team members’ accounts raised questions about judgment, credit and how the official expedition narrative was shaped.

Lachenal’s notes emphasize his fear that his feet were freezing and his reluctance to continue. Later writers also argued that the expedition’s public story placed too much of the achievement around Herzog while minimizing the independence and judgment of others.

What is not seriously disputed

Herzog and Lachenal reached the summit on June 3, 1950; they climbed without supplementary oxygen; the summit was the first ascent of an 8,000er; both suffered catastrophic frostbite; and the full expedition played a decisive role in getting them off the mountain alive.

South face of Annapurna I in Nepal
Annapurna I, opposite side from the 1950 North Face route. Wikimedia Commons.
The beginning of the 8,000-metre era

Annapurna Opened the Golden Age of Himalayan Mountaineering

When Herzog and Lachenal stood on the summit, no 8,000-metre mountain had ever been climbed. Over the next fourteen years, all fourteen principal 8,000ers would receive first ascents.

1950

Annapurna I

Herzog and Lachenal made the first successful 8,000-metre ascent.

The barrier was psychological as much as technical.
1953

Everest

Edmund Hillary and Tenzing Norgay reached the highest summit on Earth three years later.

Annapurna had already shown that humans could climb above 8,000 m.
Historical achievement vs modern mortality data

The 1950 Expedition Does Not Explain Annapurna’s 13.4% Death-to-Summit Ratio

Global Summit Guide’s current Himalayan Database comparison lists Annapurna I at 75 recorded deaths and 557 recorded summits, or 13.46 deaths per 100 summits. The first-ascent expedition contributed two summits and zero deaths to that record.

1950 deaths0No member of the French expedition died.
1950 summits2Herzog and Lachenal.
Current HDB deaths75Current Global Summit Guide / Himalayan Database comparison.
Current ratio13.46%Deaths divided by recorded summits—not individual odds.

The first ascent still exposed Annapurna’s defining hazard.

The 1951 records describe avalanche-prone snow, icefalls, large crevasses and séracs on the North Face. Modern equipment and rescue systems changed, but objective avalanche and serac exposure remained central to the mountain’s risk history.

Annapurna 1950 FAQ

Direct Answers About the First 8,000er

The summit facts are well established; the later controversy concerns interpretation, judgment and credit rather than whether the ascent occurred.

Who first climbed Annapurna I?

Maurice Herzog and Louis Lachenal of France made the first ascent on June 3, 1950.

Was Annapurna the first 8,000-metre mountain ever climbed?

Yes. Herzog and Lachenal’s 1950 summit was the first successful ascent of any 8,000-metre peak. Everest was first climbed three years later in 1953.

Did Herzog and Lachenal use supplemental oxygen?

No. Contemporary American Alpine Club and Himalayan Club accounts record the first ascent as being made without supplementary oxygen.

Did anyone die on the 1950 Annapurna expedition?

No. The expedition had no deaths, but Herzog and Lachenal suffered catastrophic frostbite and the descent nearly became fatal.

What amputations did Maurice Herzog have after Annapurna?

The Himalayan Journal states that Herzog lost all of his fingers and all of his toes as a result of the frostbite suffered during the descent.

What amputations did Louis Lachenal have?

Lachenal lost all of his toes to frostbite.

Why did Herzog lose his gloves?

While handling his camera or equipment near the summit, Herzog removed his gloves and lost them down the slope. That exposure contributed to catastrophic frostbite in his hands.

Why is Herzog’s account controversial?

Later publication of Louis Lachenal’s notebooks and other team accounts challenged parts of the heroic narrative, especially summit-decision tension and how credit was distributed. The summit achievement itself is not seriously disputed.

The Annapurna 1950 lesson

The First 8,000er Was a Summit Victory and a Descent Survival Story.

Herzog and Lachenal changed mountaineering history on June 3, 1950. But the meaning of Annapurna is larger than two names on a summit list. Lachenal’s judgment, Terray and Rébuffat’s rescue, Schatz’s route finding, Oudot’s medical care, Angtharkay and the Sherpas’ physical support, and the long evacuation all belong to the achievement. Annapurna opened the 8,000-metre era—and immediately demonstrated that reaching the top does not finish the climb.

Was this helpful?

Yes
No
Thanks for your feedback!
About Global Summit Guide

Global Summit Guide is an independent mountaineering resource founded in 2026. The team combines first-hand trekking and climbing experience with in-depth research and professional health and nutrition review to help climbers choose objectives, prepare properly, and stay safe.

Travis LudlowFounder & Head of Research · Master's in Business
Dawson LudlowClimbing & Mountaineering Lead
Walker LudlowClimber & Contributor

Health, altitude, and nutrition content is reviewed by Taylor Ludlow (Registered Nurse) and Brigg Hoopes (Nutritionist).

What We Don't Know Yet

Mountain information changes quickly. This box explains the limits of what this page can responsibly promise.

  • Visa, passport, vaccination, border, insurance, and local transportation rules may change before your trip.
  • Route conditions, snowpack, closures, and weather can change quickly after this page is updated.
  • Permit rules, fees, quotas, and reservation windows may change between review cycles.
  • Operator availability, pricing, guide ratios, and cancellation terms can change by season.
  • Your fitness, altitude response, risk tolerance, and experience level may change what is safe or realistic.
Confidence: Medium

Verify current conditions with official land managers, guide services, local forecasts, and current route reports before booking or climbing.

Safety, medical & liability disclaimer

Mountaineering, rock and ice climbing, glacier travel, and high-altitude activity are inherently dangerous and can result in serious injury or death. The information on Global Summit Guide is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional instruction, qualified guiding, proper equipment, or your own judgment and experience.

Route conditions, weather, snowpack, permits, regulations, and hazards change constantly and may differ from what is described here. Details may be incomplete, out of date, or contain errors. Always verify current information with local authorities, certified guides, and official sources before making any decision in the mountains.

Nothing on this site is medical, legal, or financial advice. Our fitness, acclimatization, altitude, and nutrition content is general in nature; consult a qualified physician before beginning any strenuous exercise program or exposing yourself to high altitude.

You are solely responsible for your own safety and decisions. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Global Summit Guide and its team accept no liability for any loss, injury, damage, or expense arising from use of, or reliance on, this information. By using this site you acknowledge these risks and accept these terms.

Some links on this site may be affiliate links. If you buy through them we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you; this never affects our recommendations.

Global Summit Guide recommendation path

Next Best Mountain to Research

Use these recommendations to continue the right planning path instead of stopping on one page.

Use current permit, weather, route, and operator information before booking or climbing.

Language »